This woman is giving you a thumbs up. IS THIS FEMINIST?
TRIGGER WARNING. The “thumbs up” is the most phallocentric gesture imaginable. You are literally telling someone that a good job is the equivalent of growing a penis. In this case, two penises.
Additionally, this kind of casual congratulation has been known to put the recipient in a good mood, which can lead to entire minutes of complacency about their own privilege. PROBLEMATIC.
Labrinth - Express Yourself (by LabrinthVEVO)
Booo @ this not being on spotify and his CD not being in itunes.
I like teaching summer school courses more than semester long courses. I say that, as I am teaching the course that I taught last semester now, and I genuinely enjoy prepping for the class. I like being in the class. The 2hours 4x/week doesn’t seem like a burden, but a gift. I realize, in my undergraduate career, I enjoyed summer school classes more than semester classes. Maybe it’s the accelerated pace? I think they kind of feel more like a community. People aren’t pulled in as many places. I also enjoy having a bit more control over the screenings. I wish we had maybe 1 more week though. We didn’t have enough time to make it project based and get through all the readings and screenings. One week would have fixed that.
I talked to my other grandmother on Saturday. We had breakfast together. I was in Chicago to give a presentation at Northwestern (the conference was fabulous, extremely generative, and people got my project and gave fantastic feedback). Anyway. I hadn’t told my grandma about my project, so I explained the high level, public facing portion with a dabble into the theoretical, and showed her this site. She got it. She was so excited. The idea of seeing what a diaspora of black women across time and space made her share a story with me.
She has a photograph of my great-great grandmother, her grandmother. She is/was the gray eyed slave she mentioned to be previously I believe. Apparently, she is of South African descent, and we know this because she was the last generation to still speak one of the indigenous tongues of South Africa. Not sure which one though. Little details like that are so interesting. It humored me greatly because one of the photos I spoke about was the picture of the Hottentots, who are, of course from South Africa. I talked about recognizing my body, something that rarely happens, when I saw them. While the heritage it is too far back to be of any importance in my day to day life, it makes me wonder if my body shape is because of that link. I will, of course, never know. Still, cool deets.
She is going to try to get the photo scanned and sent over. I wish I had been able to meet her at her house! I would have just taken a picture with my phone. Alas, time was not on my side, and I did not have a car.
by Audre Lorde From Sister Outsider, The Crossing Press Feminist Series (1984) I agreed to take part in a New York University Institute for the Humanities conference a year ago, with the understanding that I would be commenting upon papers dealing with the role of difference within the lives of American women: difference of race, sexuality, class, and age. The absence of these considerations weakens any feminist discussion of the personal and the political. It is a particular academic arrogance to assume any discussion of feminist theory without examining our many differences, and without a significant input from poor women, Black and Third World women, and lesbians. And yet, I stand here as a Black lesbian feminist, having been invited to comment within the only panel at this conference where the input of Black feminists and lesbians is represented. What this says about the vision of this conference is sad, in a country where racism, sexism, and homophobia are inseparable. To read this program is to assume that lesbian and Black women have nothing to say about existentialism, the erotic, women's culture and silence, developing feminist theory, or heterosexuality and power. And what does it mean in personal and political terms when even the two Black women who did present here were literally found at the last hour? What does it mean when the tools of a racist patriarchy are used to examine the fruits of that same patriarchy? It means that only the most narrow perimeters of change are possible and allowable. The absence of any consideration of lesbian consciousness or the consciousness of Third World women leaves a serious gap within this conference and within the papers presented here. For example, in a paper on material relationships between women, I was conscious of an either/or model of nurturing which totally dismissed my knowledge as a Black lesbian. In this paper there was no examination of mutuality between women, no systems of shared support, no interdependence as exists between lesbians and women-identified women. Yet it is only in the patriarchal model of nurturance that women "who attempt to emancipate themselves pay perhaps too high a price for the results," as this paper states. For women, the need and desire to nurture each other is not pathological but redemptive, and it is within that knowledge that our real power is rediscovered. It is this real connection which is so feared by a patriarchal world. Only within a patriarchal structure is maternity the only social power open to women. Interdependency between women is the way to a freedom which allows the I to be, not in order to be used, but in order to be creative. This is a difference between the passive be and the active being. Advocating the mere tolerance of difference between women is the grossest reformism. It is a total denial of the creative function of difference in our lives. Difference must be not merely tolerated, but seen as a fund of necessary polarities between which our creativity can spark like a dialectic. Only then does the necessity for interdependency become unthreatening. Only within that interdependency of different strengths, acknowledged and equal, can the power to seek new ways of being in the world generate, as well as the courage and sustenance to act where there are no charters. Within the interdependence of mutual (nondominant) differences lies that security which enables us to descend into the chaos of knowledge and return with true visions of our future, along with the concomitant power to effect those changes which can bring that future into being. Difference is that raw and powerful connection from which our personal power is forged. As women, we have been taught either to ignore our differences, or to view them as causes for separation and suspicion rather than as forces for change. Without community there is no liberation, only the most vulnerable and temporary armistice between an individual and her oppression. But community must not mean a shedding of our differences, nor the pathetic pretense that these differences do not exist. Those of us who stand outside the circle of this society's definition of acceptable women; those of us who have been forged in the crucibles of difference -- those of us who are poor, who are lesbians, who are Black, who are older -- know that survival is not an academic skill. It is learning how to stand alone, unpopular and sometimes reviled, and how to make common cause with those others identified as outside the structures in order to define and seek a world in which we can all flourish. It is learning how to take our differences and make them strengths. For the master's tools will never dismantle the master's house. They may allow us temporarily to beat him at his own game, but they will never enable us to bring about genuine change. And this fact is only threatening to those women who still define the master's house as their only source of support. Poor women and women of Color know there is a difference between the daily manifestations of marital slavery and prostitution because it is our daughters who line 42nd Street. If white American feminist theory need not deal with the differences between us, and the resulting difference in our oppressions, then how do you deal with the fact that the women who clean your houses and tend your children while you attend conferences on feminist theory are, for the most part, poor women and women of Color? What is the theory behind racist feminism? In a world of possibility for us all, our personal visions help lay the groundwork for political action. The failure of academic feminists to recognize difference as a crucial strength is a failure to reach beyond the first patriarchal lesson. In our world, divide and conquer must become define and empower. Why weren't other women of Color found to participate in this conference? Why were two phone calls to me considered a consultation? Am I the only possible source of names of Black feminists? And although the Black panelist's paper ends on an important and powerful connection of love between women, what about interracial cooperation between feminists who don't love each other? In academic feminist circles, the answer to these questions is often, "We did not know who to ask." But that is the same evasion of responsibility, the same cop-out, that keeps Black women's art out of women's exhibitions, Black women's work out of most feminist publications except for the occasional "Special Third World Women's Issue," and Black women's texts off your reading lists. But as Adrienne Rich pointed out in a recent talk, white feminists have educated themselves about such an enormous amount over the past ten years, how come you haven't also educated yourselves about Black women and the differences between us -- white and Black -- when it is key to our survival as a movement? Women of today are still being called upon to stretch across the gap of male ignorance and to educate men as to our existence and our needs. This is an old and primary tool of all oppressors to keep the oppressed occupied with the master's concerns. Now we hear that it is the task of women of Color to educate white women -- in the face of tremendous resistance -- as to our existence, our differences, our relative roles in our joint survival. This is a diversion of energies and a tragic repetition of racist patriarchal thought. Simone de Beauvoir once said: "It is in the knowledge of the genuine conditions of our lives that we must draw our strength to live and our reasons for acting." Racism and homophobia are real conditions of all our lives in this place and time. I urge each one of us here to reach down into that deep place of knowledge inside herself and touch that terror and loathing of any difference that lives there. See whose face it wears. Then the personal as the political can begin to illuminate all our choices.
Danseuse de la région de Mobaye (Oubangui)Jeune fille du village de Poto-Poto avec une coiffure de perles. Elève de la mission catholique, répondant au nom “”d’Héliani”“, elle fut repéré par Ellebé lors d’un tam-tam (fête) à Poto-Poto et devint un de ses modèles pour une série de photographies intitulée “”Eve noire”“.
1943, Congo
Going to attempt to translate this as best as I can (feel free to correct me):
Dancer from the Mobaye region (Oubangui)
Young girl from the village of Poto-Poto with a hairstyle of pearls. Student at the Catholic mission, who responds to the name “Heilani”, she was spotted by Ellebe at a tam-tam festival/celebration at Poto-Poto and became one of his models for a photographic series titled, “Black Eve”.
Highly disturbing eroticism and exoticism at its finest. After some quick searching, I came across this blog entry that gives some background behind the intent of this photographic series (book here), and sheds some further light on the issue of black women’s (naked) bodies, and other non-Western women, as subjects for the intense, and at times perverse, sexual desires and fantasies of white men.
There’s just something about “Heilani’s” expression, and the intense gaze of the white men in the background on her nude body, that embodies this fetish.
Opinions welcome.
- DynamicAfrica
Debated posting this one. I was so uncomfortable when I saw it. Everything, from the story to her expression, to the men in the background. I was actually a bit shocked when this one came up in this specific search because it wasn’t like the other photos that came up. It stood out because it was so out of place. I have since purchased a used copy of the book online and will probably do something with it outside of vintageblackbeauty, depending on how it is, because a series of these photos is too heart heavy for me to have in that space… this photo is the epitome of what makes people of color, especially women of color, cringe when they think of people studying “the Other” when the other is “me”. This photo though good job at illustrating that everyone and every place has a different stake in this. Like, I can’t believe this was their student and they had her do this. I am glad to see that I’m not the only one who had this reaction, but grateful that we have a space to speak about it.
Bisso na Bisso-L’union (by loonymoonz)
Older song to start the day… well, really I started in some digital archives, but then I thought of this song. I loved this song so much when I was younger <3